Any modern and happy user of Kurzweil softwares out there?

By TheBlindGuy07, 29 August, 2025

Forum
Assistive Technology

So I just know that they exist, and they are older probably than NVAccess, same legacy ish company as Freedom Scientific.
Why the heck would anyone want to pay +$1000 for an OCR software in 2025 especially considering that Pneuma Solutions offering is so so much better, and actually maintained and upgraded? Okay the only downside is that as far as I know last time I tried Scribe it's technically a bit inconvenient to actually scan from the web with a flatbed scanner, from Double Tap I know that they are actively working to patch the only real pseudo arguments some people have for the other legacy style softwares. Is Kurzweil as bad as OpenBook in terms of unpatched bugs for modern windows versions, which I unfortunately happen to have through RAMQ, my only real regret of government money wasted in recent years.

Options

Comments

By Chris Hill on Friday, August 29, 2025 - 16:29

If you want to scan a book, or many books, you need something robust. I doubt if any newer software meets the criteria.

By Brian on Friday, August 29, 2025 - 20:54

Back in my early college days, I used Kurzweil 3000 for the iPad. I will say that, for what it does, it is very good. That is to say, use it to read textbooks. I would not dare use it for casual or leisurely reading though.
My personal issue with this type of software is that instead of just using gestures to read, like you would on Kindle for example, you have buttons for reading forward, going backward, reading by character, reading by word, reading by line, etc. Everything is its own control, which makes it a tedious implementation of software use.
Just my two cents.

By Voracious P. Brain on Friday, August 29, 2025 - 22:02

K1000 hasn't been updated to a new version since 2013 or 2014. They've put out some maintenance patches. I still use my copy from 2012 or 2013, because, like Chris said, the simple/free stuff doesn't cut it. Not just for books, but for semantics. ABBYY Fine Reader has always been great at parsing sentences and the like to actually infer accurate OCR results. ScanSoft wasn't at all far behind. Jaws uses an older ScanSoft engine for its Convenient OCR, so it's pretty good. ABBYY now is an expensive subscription model, but it uses machine-learning. I'm pretty sure a paid A.I. subscription can get you document recognition by now, but I haven't looked into it. With a subscription to a Vision model like GPT4V or Gemini Vision Pro, you can send images page by page and ask for the text. Or so Copilot tells me. Copilot says a lot of nonsense, though.

By Tara on Sunday, August 31, 2025 - 17:20

Hi,
I had Kurzweil 1000 years ago for scanning books. I had to scan a 900 page book for work once. It was my last resort, because there were no online versions available for that particular up-to-date edition. So I got to like 800 pages, and I happened to check on the off-chance whether it was now available on Kindle, and it was. So all that work for nothing. I tried scanning another couple of language learning books, but I just didn't have the heart to finish them. I had a plustek flatbed scanner, which was too big considering I hardly ever used it in the end, so I got rid of it. If I need a book, it's usually available online these days anyway. I wouldn't go back to Kurzweil and a scanner. And yes, you can send images of scanned PDF pages to an AI. I've done that with ChatGPT plus and the paid version of Gemini I'm on, and the AI Content Describer add-on with NVDA, and the results are excellent. There have only been a few times it's halucinated.