I must eat my hat. It seems they are bringing voiceover support to iPhone mirroring after all. It's still pretty clunky, navigation is difficult in some apps, voiceover on iPhone still talks if you don't use VO commands in the mac app, some fields are not shown such as writing messages in whatsapp or reading the name of the sender, it's slow as in transitions between screens, and I can't seem to work out a shortcut for going back through pages in apps, or up I guess, as I have tried VO [ as I would do it on a bluetooth keyboard using iPhone, but doesn't work here.
Still, a good WIP and promising. I briefly watched some Netflix on my computer using the native app, read some whatsapp messages in an app that doesn't blow, and listened to an audible book without it all getting confused with syncing if I'd listened to it on my mac, which is also a rubbish app.
I'll be interested to see how this fits in to everyone's work flow. It may be a lot of accessibility issues can be worked around by using iPhone instead of the mac app but whilst staying on mac.
Comments
To go back you have to do VO…
To go back you have to do VO and escape. A bit awkward.
There is also a need to drill down into some elements, for example in the TV app in continue watching, VO shift down arrow.
How about SharePlay?
Hi,
That's amazing news. Does this mean that SharePlay is now working with VoiceOver as well? Can anyone test this?
Which aspect of Share Play?…
Which aspect of Share Play? I believe sharing content to other devices from things liek apple TV have worked for a while. Do you mean the share play to car play or home pod where users can line up tracks in a colaborative way?
SharePlay
With the new releases, you should be able to control other people's devices over SharePlay in a FaceTime call, for example. Would be nice if that also works.
Oh, not tried that
Oh, not tried that
Is notification sounds coming through on iPhone mirroring?
Hi, that's awesome! is notification sounds coming through on iPhone mirroring? example, whenever you receive a message on either the native messages app or whatsapp?
This is awesome!
So the next developer beta is the 15.1 beta 5 or something like that right?
Developer beta 5 (public…
Developer beta 5 (public beta 2) is the most current seed as of the time of this writing.
I'm on developer beta 5 18.1…
I'm on developer beta 5 18.1 which is where I've observed this behaviour.
Regarding notification sounds, I've not tested. I could play audible and Netflix and Disney, though I think that is acting more like airplay than a direct stream of what is on the phone, could be wrong though.
Hopefully some others will be able to have a play and give their feedback. It's not quite functional enough to be useful, but is very promising.
Shame
These features should have been accessible on day One! From my limited testing, the SharePlay remote screen control feature is also completely inaccessible. You can start a session, but there's no way to know what's going on. Every time Apple does something wonderful like enhanced Braille Screen Input or the VoiceOver tutorial, they drop the ball in other areas like this. I don't understand.
I think that it is becoming…
I think that it is becoming accessible is a glass half full kind of thing. Hopefully they will top it up and, as with any of these new things, it doesn't make our existing experience worse. The fact it is trailing is annoying, I agree with that.
Pretty sweet!
I ran the public betas until the major releases came out, then turned them off, but this sounds exciting. I think I will really really like being able to screen mirror. Would also be pretty sweet if they let us put shortcuts to the iPhone apps we plan on using most right on our docks, so when we want to get to one of those fast, it would fire up iPhone mirroring and bring us right in to that app.
Even if they don't do that, I think this could be neat.
Saw The mirroring app...
I saw this in my list of apps, and I opened it to have a look around. It actually looks pretty accessible on its own. What is the difference between this, Hand-off, and that catalyst project which makes iOS apps available on the Mac and vice versa? In any case this looks interesting and I think I can see some usage for it. I believe I've only tried out one iOS app on the Mac, that being Weather Gods. It was pretty sluggish on my M1 MBA, but I think everyone knows how this app performs on iOS.
@Ekaj
So, the thing is, not all devs release the iOS version to also run on Mac OS. Can they? Yes, it only requires a button press to make it be able to install on Mac OS, but for whatever reason, a lot of people don't.
So Handoff works with apps where there is a version available for both the mac and iPhone, allowing you to pick up a task on a different device, say you started to look something up on your phone, you can then resume with that tab on the iPad or Mac.
With the iPhone screen mirroring, you are technically running everything from your phone, but getting audio and visuals from your phone, and of course using either your keyboard or trackpad to move around. No idea what this will do for battery life. It hasn't worked with Voiceover until now. It'll be cool to see how well it does work once released to the public in the stable release.
I'd love to have the google…
I'd love to have the google docs app, or even better the instagram app as last time I tried the dm are not accessible on web with any screen reader
welp
Not gunna lie, at least they're doing something about all this now but I agree with one of the previous posters above, these features should have been accessible from day one or at least, public release. People have been beta testing for months and I be hearing reports were sent about all of this when I've heard reports about this not being accessible and upon first public release. Yet, while they did a lot of work with voiceover of which, I'm quite grateful for, their should be no excuse when one of apple's main features aren't accessible right out the gate when public releases comes around. This all should have been hammmered out upon beta! I quite do not understand of why apple likes to talk the talk but not walk the walk as it were. I'd like to wonder what it would take for us to get a jobat apple's accessibility team because clearly, people who are working their right now ain't doing their jobs. Things started going down hill once Tim took office and I for one would love another person like Steave Jobs to take the torch and bring apple back to what they were back in the day. But hey, I can dream can't I? Never the less, glad this is now becoming a reallity even if I don't have one of the newer macs that can run this latest OS.
Not surprising taht it was delayed slightly
It's probably a lot of software development work to transfer the accessibility API data over the network from iPhone to Mac, so I'm not surprised that it didn't make the initial release. This is very different from making an application accessible. You need mechanisms to serialize the data, transfer them, and then make them available to VoiceOver on the Mac side. Commands issued on the Mac need to be applied on the iPhone.
Jason I agree with you
I would rather they take a little to get it right. if they released it early and it had bugs people would complain. They are ihn a no win situation.
agree with John
yes this should have bin accessible from day one, now i don't know how bad it was but if you cant get VO to come through the computer speakers just use the Iphone speakers so we have at least some way of useing it wi'll making it so vo comes through the computer speakers
I also agree
I also agree. They should've added Accessibility support since day one. I'm glad that Apple has added support for this. Hoping in the future continued Accessibility improvements are made. again, any bugs you come accross, be sure to report it for future beta builds.
I see both spoints, but i'm with denis on this one
This is not like say, the accessibility of an app, this one is more complex. Heck, for all we know, from day 1, they could've been working on accessibility for it. Another example? Apple intelligence. That, acording to some of you, should also have come at the very least, at on the public release; its still not out, because these things are more complex and take more time to get working than say, the accessibility of an app. You have to see the bigger picture here, not just the, oh it’s not out on day 1 but it should've been... if it was? With all the amount of bugs people in general had to be reporting? This would've been lost amongst all the other bugs. I, for one don't mind the wait. Also, keep in mind, sighted people where testing this as well, which would've added to the noise, so to speak and made things far more complicated for apple, as they'd had to work on 2 fronts, accessibility and the sighted parts of this. And if the sighted parts of this, are showing bugs, as an example? A bit disappointing to see the lack of patience of some here, bug I digress. As said though, these things take a while, and its beeing made accessible in the end, so why complain if, oh, its not in the timeframe I wanted it in! as someone said its a lose lose here with some of you.
thank you Igna
Like I said they were in a no win situation here. If they released it and it were full of bugs those same people would complain about it. They hold it back to make sure it is ready and people are still critical of them. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.
re, denis
Yeah sometimes attitudes like some of what we see here just... Makes me ashamed of the blind comunity in general and to be part of it, hense my not associating with it as much as I could, to be completely frank. I mean, its still being made accessible in the end so... Why complain in the first place? Now. If it wasn't going to be made accessible at all? Totally justified, and I'd add my voice to the rest but, complaining just because oh why it’s not beeing delivered on day one! why! Again, one should look at the bigger picture here. I mean, interesting how some are complaining about this not coming since day one or at release and yet... The same lens isn't applied to say, apple intelligence; which at the end of the day; same story really. Anyway I digress. Tbh we've seen this happen in the passed, I.e, I believe it was in the earlier moddles of the apple watch, voiceover didn't work at first, it took a while for it to arrive, something like that anyway.
Not sure if i'll try it out now or just wait for the public version for this to come out but, I'm glad to see this is getting accessibility as well.
@Igna
I could agree with those frustrated if it were iOS 18.2 or 18.3 or 18.4 and it weren't accessible but to me they are making sure it is polished. You also need to keep in mind they have to make sure major bugs that could've impacted people running 18.0 were fixed first. In a perfect world sure it would've worked from day one. But that isn't the case. It is working and most likely will be in 18.1 so not a huge deal.
Don't undermine Criticisms
It's a Multi-Trillian dollar company. It can very well afford to employ an army of accessibility specialist and get everything sorted on time. The only reason they are not doing it is that we have normalized having bugs and accessibility issues in initial releases of softwares. May be a $500 phone company can do that, but I expect everything to be working in perfect working condition, without any accessibility issues for a thousand dollar phone.
no software is bug free
If you expect everything to be perfect you need to get realistic!! No software is never going to be bug free anywhere.
While we can't know for sure…
While we can't know for sure, it's conceivable that feedback and pressure from users to make iPhone Mirroring accessible contributed to positive movement in the 15.1 beta cycle. Especially with accessibility, I get the sense that Apple, for better or worse, makes the most significant progress in response to user observations and criticism, like the kind often featured on this website.
I think the discussion about…
I think the discussion about iPhone mirroring not being accessible with VoiceOver in the initial macOS 15.0 release overlooks some important points. While some users expected this feature to be fully accessible from the start, I don’t believe that’s a completely fair expectation.
First, iPhone mirroring is not just a simple app—it involves transferring everything on the iPhone’s display to another device, such as a Mac, and making all that content interact smoothly with VoiceOver. This is technically complex, and Apple has to ensure not only the display transfer but also that VoiceOver’s accessibility layers work seamlessly with the mirrored content.
To be fair, Apple has resolved many bugs that users had been reporting for a long time. Of course, other issues have been introduced, like the inaccessibility of the recovery partition in French, which is frustrating. But it’s important to remember that they can’t fix everything at once—they have to prioritize.
While I personally would have loved for iPhone mirroring to be accessible with VoiceOver right from the start, and I agree that it’s a shame it wasn’t, I also think it’s understandable. Apple has made accessibility a priority and continues to improve, so I expect future updates will address this. Unfortunately, for me, since I’m in Europe, the feature isn’t compatible, so I won’t be able to test it myself.
The thing is that macos has…
The thing is that macos has so many voiceover bugs here and there that this one not being accessible in the beta cycle made people less tollerent than usual, although as long as they are working on it it's the least of my problem, and macos 15 aside some usual old bugs has already patched quite a lot. Voiceover shortcuts is actually a quality of life update for us in terms of keyboard ergonomy for once when you really start leveraging it. Now I also wish that the screen share remote control also becomes accessible which will eat market share for RIM :)
I am personally less tollerent with macos voiceover bugs than ios, because mac is just so cluncky and convoluted to use. I think SNR has seen the tollerence limit of many here and outside applevis, and for that only I can perfectly understand the frustration I also tend to share to an extent.
SNR
That’s that bug where vo freezes and you can’t do anything for a wile right? Sorry I never used a Mack so I am not sure what it fully is
I guess we agree to disagree.
I think it could have been done better, others may choose to think otherwise.
This was a flagship feature in this release, and the fact that it was inaccessible would have been noted by Quality Assurance teams. Someone somewhere said that's okay, let's ship it, we will figure out accessibility later. That's not a bug, it's a prioritization issue.
All I am saying is that that's not acceptable. Shipping Feature first and accessibility later shouldn't be the common practice. That's how we end up with no accessibility experts on the development teams, and the feedback cycle.
Please! please! demand accessibility from the start. We all know it's importance!
Re: I guess we agree to disagree.
I see both sides to this however with that being said, sorry but gotta agree here. There is better ways of handeling this. Either wait until things are ready for release and ship on a later version if things are not working right or fix things from the start. The mirroring feature could have honest to god waited until it was accessible. I'm not buying that this is a bug at all, rather buying that accessibility team dropped the ball on this one. Sorry not sorry. Here's my take. I would have been less frustrated about all of this if apple would have treeted mac OS accessibility the same as they're treeting IOS, but no. The fact that it's taking them this long to fix major, serious, long standing bugs really don't sit right. It's why I'm not even thinking about either getting a new mac or upgrading. I'll bet ya money, if serious features weren't working right for sighted people, apple would have no issues fixing them at all and they'd get the ball wolling. We've seen this time and time again yet while we are treated like second class. Look, I'm not expecting an OS nor screen readers to be totally free of bugs, but there's got to be some countabillity here and this ain't it. apple needs to prioritize accessibility and as of right now, they ain't walkin' the walk. Only talkin' the talk.
Not how software development works
There's a common argument in the blind community that since Apple is a trillion-dollar company, they should be able to hire as many software developers and accessibility testers as needed to fix all the bugs quickly. But that's not how software development works.
In fact, adding more developers to a project that’s already late usually makes it take even longer. The more people working on a project, the more they have to coordinate with each other. This extra coordination often leads to mistakes, delays, and people getting in each other’s way.
Also, adding more people only helps if the work can be split up easily. For example, 50 people baking 50 pizzas with 50 ovens will finish faster than 50 people trying to bake 50 pizzas with just 10 ovens.
Large software projects are usually very hard to divide up, and having more people often means spending even more time planning and organizing. On top of that, I imagine Apple's iOS and macOS accessibility teams are separate, so they have to coordinate between teams, making things even harder. Just throwing money at the problem won’t make it go faster—in fact, it might slow it down.
it's awesome!
I just updated to MacOS 15.1 beta 5, and it's awesome! I have my iphone connected, and I'm able to hear all notification sounds coming through my mac. one thing is that you cannot switch pages unlike you could in iOS. Maybe it'll be fixed soon in future builds. nevertheless, apple has done a splended job in supporting iPhone mirroring with VoiceOver.
Changing pages
For me, I've had success changing Home Screen pages via iPhone Mirroring by focusing on the picker and choosing to scroll left or right from the actions menu.
it works!
it works! I tested the third party apps like gmail and clubhouse. I can even listen to the audio from a clubhouse room from my macs internal speakers..
Safari doesn't work yet
But yes! Thank you Apple! If this is a the preview of what to come next I'm happy Apple is actively working on it. I was able to access the settings app, and best than all, the journaling app that in my humble opinion should've been for all platform and not just iphone. In Safari you can access the address bar but no the page itself yet. Date selector doesn't seem to work in a third party app but they are standard selecter we can have in a webview for date of birth, one for months, days and years at the bottom of the screen? I'll try with actions. But yeah! It's coming.
1. It's a trillian dollar…
1. It's a trillian dollar company with ridiculous resources.
2. The roadmap for all of their OS is very long.
3. We've forgone longer bug testing meaning that when it is released to the public there are likely to be more bugs thatn there would have been if they'd had it working with voiceover on beta 1.
There is always going to be this struggle between those who demand we are treated the same as every other customer, and those who are more lenient. I don't think that will ever be resolved, and we need both types of people. I'm obviously the former, but we don't have to be at odds. We need both sorts.
Without people complaining about SNR, for example, I don't hold much faith that it would have been resolved. Apple, to me, as an accessibility provider, has done some amazing things in the past, and continue to do amazing things, the new brail screen input is outstanding... But there are outstanding bugs, reported, discussed, unresolved, which leaves me feeling less generous than some of the rest of you. We are paying customers, they are not doing us a favour. They use us for advertising when showing off just how virtuous they are in making pointless apps. Their own apps behave worse with accessibility than many 3rd party apps where developers have actually taken the time to make it work for us, ulysses comes to mind.
I don't believe they deserve a break on such things.
I am quite skeptical with its current implementation
In very short we seem to have the worst combination possible ever of iphone voiceover and mac voiceover, as both navigation models conflict with each other in pretty much every step.
Okay it's already very useful as I can now chat peacefully on instagram DMs thanks to this, so good job apple. But if they keep this and only make incremental bug corrections I fear that this feature will be the single most hated one by blind people.
Basically we have to invoke the action menu with vo shift cmd space to scroll pages, text editing is very weird as vo end and vo home work but vo up and down don't, and you can't use single arrow keys to navigate text, or to navigate whatsoever. Focus loss is a huge bug as we can be stuck in the status bar and we can only wait to hopefully be back in the app soon (5-15s). I am on the latest betas. It is not just a keyboard emulation passed to the iphone and voiceover speech and sound passed back to mac with speech as they could have totally done liek what numa solutions do with nvda addon and rim, rather all the ui is passed to mac voiceover, with its rotor and navigation model which is unadapted for touch. I seriously wonder whether they test with blind users or just get their accessibility implementation done as an mvp here? Google docs is still better on the mac in web than the app, to give you an idea.
Anyways. I'll keep reporting and hopefully we see improvements in the stable releases, but if the .1 releases are to be public soon then those who haven't tested in the beta beware that it is not what we were probably imagining it will be.
Keypad
allows to do more or less that with a better experience, just have to turn voiceover off :)