As the iPhone X was for iPhone and the Series 4 was for Apple Watch, the 2018 iPad Pro is a significant step forward for the iPad. Sporting a completely new and striking design with slimmer bezels than ever before, it is powered by a processor capable of outperforming those in several current MacBook models; gains Face ID biometric authentication that works in any screen orientation; and switches from Apple's proprietary Lightning port to USB-C.
Additionally, by removing the Home button and slimming down the bezels, Apple has been able to give the new 11-inch iPad Pro essentially the same overall footprint as the 10.5-inch model it replaces, whilst the 12.9-inch version puts the same-sized display into a much smaller form factor than the prior 12.9-inch model.
In short, the 2018 iPad Pro is the best iPad ever made ... and since its launch I have been curious whether it would be a good fit for my use case and workflows.
For it to fit, the iPad Pro would need to offer me something new or better to what my iPhone XS Max and 2014 MacBook Pro already deliver. I wanted to believe that there was scope for this, but any musings on this nearly always returned to it being a lot to spend on something which might only offer a small return.
However, it was an itch that kept urging to be scratched, and this week that urge finally became irresistible, and I found myself hurrying home from my local Apple Store clutching a 12.9-inch iPad Pro and a Smart Keyboard Folio.
I headed home with what I believed to be realistic expectations for the iPad Pro: I would love the new design, find the performance far greater than I needed, and encounter enough hardware and software limitations to prevent it from being a complete replacement for the MacBook Pro.
I would also like to believe that I knew and was prepared to embrace that transferring established workflows to the iPad Pro would in many cases require me to find new ways of doing things. I anticipated a learning curve with iOS and VoiceOver on iPad, maybe some different apps to find and familiarise myself with, and that all of this might take some time and initially bring some frustrations.
Whilst I anticipated that some tasks and workflows would not transfer well to iPad, my hope was that enough would actually prove to be more efficient for the iPad Pro to justify a place alongside my iPhone and MacBook Pro.
What I was not expecting was to be disappointed with the experience of VoiceOver on iPad; or that VoiceOver might be a factor in the number of my routine tasks and workflows that would be transferred to it from my iPhone and Mac. But, after two days of fairly heavy use - two days spent testing and playing around with some routine tasks and workflows - the frustration of what I felt to be a subpar VoiceOver experience compared to that on iPhone and Mac proved to be more than I was prepared to tolerate. Consequently, the iPad Pro was disappointedly returned to the Apple Store for a refund.
I appreciate that many will argue that I should have given the iPad Pro more time. But, sometimes you have to go with your gut, and my gut was warning me that the iPad had all the signs of becoming little more than an extremely expensive desk ornament.
Looking back on my 48 hours with the iPad Pro, the die was possibly cast within seconds of powering it on for the first time. Before even completing the initial welcome and setup screens, I had encountered a badly labelled button and landed on a screen where VoiceOver didn't make it obvious how to navigate back to where I needed to be.
As much as I wanted to give the iPad Pro a fair chance, this early ‘hiccup’ was enough to send my thoughts off to the $1200 that I had just spent on it, and I think it's safe to assume that the price paid was an ‘elephant in the room’ every time I encountered further problems or frustrations over the next two days.
In fact, If I was honest with myself, I would probably have to admit that the main reason for returning the iPad Pro was that I never felt comfortable with its price, and that I am using what might in the scheme of things be minor and manageable VoiceOver issues to justify my decision.
Despite this admission, I believe that I would still have the iPad Pro if it weren't for the problems and frustrations I experienced with VoiceOver.
Before continuing, I should mention that another expectation for the iPad Pro was that I would nearly always use it with the Smart Keyboard Folio. This was actually why I opted for the 12.9-inch model, as the Smart Keyboard for the 11-inch version has several keys that are smaller than those on the 12.9-inch model's keyboard, and I thought that all of the keys being full-sized would be more forgiving towards my large fingers and typing capabilities.
I also anticipated that much of what I would use the iPad Pro for could be done faster and more efficiently with a keyboard. In fact, using the iPad with the Smart Keyboard Folio was something that I was looking forward to, and something that I believed would significantly help with transferring tasks and workflows from my Mac.
I was to be reminded of this expectation every time that I raised my hand from the keyboard to locate and touch something on the iPad's screen. Often, this was done simply because it was quicker than using the keyboard to get to the area of the page where I wanted to be. Many people might reasonably argue that this demonstrates the power and flexibility of having both the keyboard and touchscreen available. For me, it simply felt disjointed. However, perhaps this just highlights the effect of my keyboard-centric use of computers over the past 40 years that's left me with a lot of habits and memory muscle to get in the way of doing things differently.
Given time, I would probably have adjusted and adapted, perhaps even come to like, combining keyboard and touchscreen. However, this would probably only have been the case when this hybrid approach was the best way of doing something. If I'm forced to reach for the screen because it's the only option, it's likely to garner a less positive response from me, and too frequently during my time with the iPad Pro there were situations where it appeared impossible to locate and access all page elements with keyboard alone. On these occasions, I would need to touch the screen before VoiceOver focus would move to where I wanted it.
A case in point was the Drafts app - the app that I was probably most looking forward to using on iPad, and that I thought would not only help to bridge the gap for tasks and workflows transferring from the Mac, but actually make many of these more efficient and a better user experience on the iPad Pro.
Imagine my disappointment, therefore, upon finding that navigating the area of the app that's home to most of its ‘magic’ could not be done consistently or reliably with the keyboard. As was also the case with some other apps, my experience was that VoiceOver focus would get stuck looping through one small area of what was on screen, and the only way to get it out of that loop was by touching the screen. The experience grated, and did nothing to make me sympathetic towards the prospect of giving the iPad Pro more time.
I will report this behaviour to the developer of the Drafts app, and hopefully they will resolve the problem in a future update. I could also reach out to the developers of other apps where I encountered similar accessibility-related quirks or issues on the iPad which aren't present when using these apps on iPhone. Again, fixes and enhancements would hopefully come. But, I bought the iPad Pro for what it would offer me now, not what it might offer at some unspecified point in the future.
My suspicion, however, is that in many cases the problems I encountered with being able to reliably move VoiceOver focus with the keyboard alone is a problem with VoiceOver itself, and not the apps themselves. I would love to hear the thoughts and experiences of iPad users on this possibility. Do you encounter similar problems? Or are you shaking your heads at how little time I gave the iPad and how this has left me with an unfair and false opinion?
Unfortunately, I encountered other VoiceOver-specific niggles - such as VoiceOver announcing that a pop-up alert had just appeared on the screen, but not being able to locate and access it with the keyboard. This was only occasional, but it happened enough times to suggest an underlying issue and to become frustrating.
One of the main takeaways I have from my time with the iPad Pro - and one which demonstrates naivety on my part - is that attaching a keyboard to an iOS device does not make VoiceOver work and feel the same as it does on macOS. VoiceOver is very much a different beast on each platform, something I was reminded of every time muscle memory had me attempt to use keyboard shortcuts which aren't supported by VoiceOver on iOS.
Consequently, my current view of VoiceOver on iPad would have me reach for my iPhone if I want to do something quickly, efficiently, and with the best user experience, or reach for my MacBook Pro if I need to be productive. This has the iPad Pro squeezed out from both sides, and leaves it with little to do apart from looking pretty on my desk.
Although my time with the iPad Pro left me mostly disappointed, there are a few things that I will miss.
When sitting on the Lock Screen of my Mac; prompted to enter my user password; or needing to unlock 1Password, I will miss how Face ID on the iPad made authentication something that I didn't need to think about. It just happened in the background, leaving me to get on with whatever I wanted to do.
In particular, two taps on any of the Smart Keyboard Folio's keys to have Face ID authenticate me and unlock the iPad was slick and a very satisfying user experience. I also found Face ID on the iPad Pro to be a little more responsive and less ‘fussy’ about face position than it is on my iPhone.
Whilst on the topic of Face ID, the settings for Face ID on the iPad Pro appear to be the same as those on the iPhone, including the option to disable the requirement to be looking at the iPad. As with the iPhone, this “require attention” option is automatically disabled if you enable VoiceOver during initial set up. Although some have expressed concerns - myself included - over the potential security and privacy risks from disabling this requirement on the iPhone, it seems far less likely that somebody could take your iPad and hold it up to your face without your knowledge.
One final note on Face ID is that if you try to unlock your iPad Pro whilst your hand is covering the Face ID sensors, a warning message is shown stating “Camera covered”. In my limited testing, VoiceOver will read this message if you go searching for it, but it would be a far better user experience if this warning message were to be spoken automatically. That being said, maybe it already does under certain contexts, and I simply didn't find myself in one of them.
Now, back to some other things that I will miss ...
I will be reminded of the iPad Pro when I feel the weight of my MacBook Pro; when my knees feel the heat that the MacBook at times generates; and on the many, many occasions when VoiceOver on Mac will say “busy”.
There's a slight question mark hanging over whether I would have used the iPad Pro to watch movies and TV shows, and whether this would have offered a better experience to watching these on a television, where my residual vision contributes little. Certainly the iPad's four-speaker system that includes a woofer and tweeter in each speaker would have added to the experience and is one area where it clearly outshines both my iPhone and MacBook Pro.
Rather surprisingly, I will possibly miss the Smart Keyboard Folio. Not because it's a great keyboard in the scheme of things, but because every time I feel a key on my MacBook Pro ‘wobble’ when pressed I will be reminded of the firm and quite pleasing responsiveness of the keys on the Smart Keyboard Folio. I've read that this feel is “not too dissimilar to the butterfly keyboard on the Mac”, so perhaps I'm set to develop another "itch", one that will end up with me replacing my MacBook Pro with the new MacBook Air.
There are lots of impressive sounding benchmarks and technical terminology which hint that I should also miss the performance of the 2018 iPad Pro.
It's powered by a new A12X Bionic chip that offers 8 cores divided in 4 performance cores and 4 power efficiency cores (up from the 6 cores of the A12 chip in the iPhone XS).
Apple said on stage when announcing the 2018 iPad Pro that the A12X Bionic chip will deliver a 35% improvement in single core speeds over the A10X chip in the previous generation iPad Pro, and a 90% improvement in multi-core scores. According to Apple, this makes it faster than 92% of all portable PC computers sold in the past 12 months.
The chip also includes a new GPU with 7 cores, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second.
As I said, that all sounds very impressive. Do I understand all of it? Heck, no. Can I say that I noticed what the iPad Pro had ‘under the hood’ in my use of it? Again, heck no.
All that I can say, is that the hardware and performance of the 2018 iPad Pro should be more than capable of coping with whatever Apple has planned for iOS 13, 14 and probably beyond.
For those who like raw data when it comes to performance, you may be interested in the following MacRumors article: “New iPad Pro Has Comparable Performance to 2018 15" MacBook Pro in Benchmarks”
One final thing that I will miss about the iPad Pro, is its design. Perhaps mostly because its flat and angular sides remind me so much of my favourite iPhone design - the iPhone 5. Also, when holding it, I had to admit that the design, engineering, and build quality of the 2018 iPad Pro gave it the feel of a serious piece of kit, and goes some way towards understanding why it's the price it is.
It could be reasonably argued that I did not give the iPad Pro enough time; that, despite my claims above, I approached working on it with the wrong mindset and unfair expectations. It was never going to work like my MacBook Pro, and I should have been more open-minded and willing to try things in a different way; I should not have tried to force the iPad to work the same way as my MacBook.
In fact, whilst walking home after returning the iPad Pro, I was already thinking of things that I should have explored and tested more fully: for example, Siri Shortcuts, which could be a potential game changer for getting work done on iPad.
On this basis, I am willing to accept that if I had given the iPad Pro more time, I would have learned and become familiar with the keyboard shortcuts, gestures, and how VoiceOver works on iPad; I would have learned and adapted to how my preferred apps behave with VoiceOver on iPad... or found apps which provide a better VoiceOver experience; and that my workflows and the overall user experience would have improved.
But - and it's a very big but - the simple and harsh reality is that I found the experience of using VoiceOver on the iPad Pro in conjunction with the Smart Keyboard Folio to be disappointing. Each time I put down the iPad and reached for either my iPhone or Mac, the frustrations would disappear. Tasks which were a struggle on the iPad, or offered a poor user experience, instantly became simple and more satisfying. I truly do not believe that time would have changed this enough for the cost of the iPad Pro to feel like money well spent.
And, once again, we return to the “elephant in the room”. Perhaps I could have lived with it if I only had the iPhone to partner with the iPad Pro; if I had a use for something that could do much of what my MacBook does but is lighter and more portable; or if money wasn't a factor. As none of these apply, the constant presence of that "elephant" has made me forget my itch.
Now to wait and see what will cause the next itch.
Does anybody want to tell me about their new MacBook Air?
Some Actual Reviews of the iPad Pro and Smart Keyboard Folio
It should be clear that I didn't spend enough time with the 2018 iPad Pro and Smart Keyboard Folio to offer a comprehensive and informed review. So, below are a few links to more in-depth articles that you may find interesting:
John Gruber on Daring Fireball: The 2018 iPad Pros
Macworld: 2018 iPad Pro review: A fantastic tablet, if not a fantastic laptop
9to5Mac: 2018 iPad Pro, Apple Pencil, and Smart Keyboard Folio — a big leap from the first Pro
Craig Mod: Getting the iPad to Pro
Laptop Magazine: New iPad Pro 2018 12.9-inch - Full Review and Benchmarks
CNET: iPad Pro (2018) review: Big beautiful tablet? Yes. Flexible computer? TBD
AppleInsider: Review: Apple's Smart Keyboard Folio is the best option for the iPad Pro, but has too many compromises
I am an iPad user
All I can say about ipads and Voiceover is that at least a dozen times per month I am very thankful that I still have a little bit of useable vision and am left wondering how on earth Users with no vision manage and what iim going to do when all my vision is gone.
Hello. I am an iPad user as well and I love it most of the time. As the previous commenter noted, I also have some usable vision. I enjoy that I can use a combination of VO and my vision. I went to my Apple Store a few days ago and loved the 11 inch iPad Pro. Now that I have read this review, I'm glad I didn't act on my love for the device. I am happy with my 2018 iPad that I bought for $329 instead of $1,200.
This sounds like the debate
This sounds like the debate that goes on in other Apple forums between sighted people who think the iPad needs a mouse to be productive, and those who say it's just a different interface than what people are used to. The comments about VoiceOver's usefulness seem to be a bit like people who say trackpad mode for selecting text is a long over due addition to iOS, and they want that everywhere, like they have on their macs.
Apple didn't want to make a touch screen Mac because holding your hand up is uncomfortable, which I can't agree with more. Ever try reading a long braille list of options taped to a vending machine? For me at least, my hand is tired by the time I get halfway down the page. Yet, reaching up and touching the screen is what you have to do when you use the iPad with a keyboard. I can see why sighted people clammer for a trackpad on the smart keyboard. Microsoft got that one right, imo.
My husband gave me an iPad pro last Christmas. I really like it. I am totally blind and I haven’t experienced any issues with VoiceOver so far. I am writing my comments for this blog with the iPad Pro. I use a keyboard with a case from Logitech.
Voiceover Not Equal Between iPhone and iPad?
Having never used an iPad, I am quite surprised that the Voiceover experience is not equal between the iPhone and iPad. Isn't it the same software? If so, does anyone have any thoughts as to why the experience is different?
Personally, though I think that the iPad does lend itself to a bit of prestige, I wouldn't choose one because I am totally blind and, in my opinion, the only thing different between the iPad and iPhone is the user must travel over more real estate to accomplish the same tasks. I know that you can do split tasks and other things on the iPad, but I still choose my iPhone.
@David: Do you suppose that, if you wouldn't have used the keyboard option at all, that your experience might have been more on par with the iPhone as it relates to Voiceover?
iOS with a keyboard
I've actually never owned an iPad and never felt convinced I need to get one for a reason. Guess this review only reinforced my opinions in that regard. :-)
I've used a keyboard with my iPhone countless times, all the way from the 4S which was my very first iPhone and my very first Apple device as such, to the 5C I had borrowed for just a couple of months, to the 7 Plus, and now all the way up to the XS Max. I've used a Microsoft Wedge Mobile Keyboard and now an Apple Magic Keyboard with Numeric Keypad. I would think the experience of using a keyboard with VoiceOver would be pretty much the same on the iPhone and the iPad? For the most part, it feels really good to me, well thought out, no serious glitches, and I really love how VO has keyboard shortcuts for everything you may ever need to do, that is all of its gestures plus things like instantly reaching the status bar, opening the control or notification center, scrolling a page in any direction, the home button or gesture itself, etc, so if I really want to work that way, the only thing I need to actually physically pick up and touch my phone for is to unlock it. Well, with Face ID I guess I could even learn to unlock it without actually touching it at all, but although I already feel very comfortable with Face ID, I still haven't exactly figured out how to look at it properly for it to recognize me whilst the phone is lying down on my desk.
However, there is this occasional, pretty random and unpredictable seeming behavior where focus just gets lost entirely, or limited only to a certain subpart of the screen, and the only way to get out of that loop is to touch the screen, just as described in the review. That's always been there for as long as I can remember, and I guess it's always going to be there no matter what. It can happen on the home screen, in an Apple app, in a third party app, anywhere, and I haven't as of yet figured a consistent pattern to reproduce or describe it up to this day. So that's a significant drawback that really detracts from a keyboard only experience on an iOS device, and I'm sorry to hear it's just the same on an iPad. Yes, I do firmly believe the suspicion stated in the review, that this is an underlying issue with VO itself, not just specific apps. As I said, if only I knew how to reproduce it consistently, I'd be reporting it to Apple accessibility right now. That'd be the least I could do, although I highly doubt just one report more or less would mean any difference in whether or not they are actually going to reliably fix it one day.
Yes, in an ideal world the base experience should not be any different between the two types of iOS devices, as the underlying software is essentially the same. However, precisely the things you mentioned are the reason why some modifications and adjustments had to be done to the iPad as compared with the iPhone, where it inevitably has to work differently. That's the more real estate, the split screen, picture in picture, the dock and whatnot. The interface and layout in most areas of the iPad and in most apps is just different, as far as I understand, and I believe VO has just never been as optimized for that as it is for the iPhone. Still, as I said in my previous comment, the keyboard experience has always been the same to me even on the iPhone, ridden with this occasional unreliable focus issue, as the review describes on the iPad.
Thoughtful and entertaining
When you first started your review, I thought you were going to tell me that the new iPad was the best thing that ever happened to a blind fellow. My wife loves her iPads, but she has normal vision and enjoys all the real estate. I see nothing. For me, the iPad is like being abandoned in a large hotel conference room without a clue as to where I am. I'll stick happily within the bounds of my iPhone 8.
I doubt I would have taken a chance this year and bought an iPad for myself, but your honest assessment just means that I won't suddenly think it is a grand idea and go spend the money. I thank you, and so does my wallet.
Thanks again for writing your recent piece about the Series 4 Apple Watch. Now, that is a screen size I love.
Really nice work,
VoiceOver on iPads
I'm fully blind using VoiceOver on iPhone XS, an iMac and on an iPad Pro.
I enjoyed reading your post very much. It hit some nails on its head. When I began using an iPad with VoiceOver I was disappointed as well. Because of the larger screen, the devided surface in most apps and because of more buttons on screens than on an iPhone it seems to be more complicated to use. The finger gestures seem often not to work as easily as on an iPhone too. The only useful way to use an iPad seems to me to be via an external keyboard as you mentioned.
My opinion changed and the disappointment vanished meinly after I got used to the keyboard shortcuts. Especially CTRL + arrow keys and Option + arrow keys are so helpful to navigate quickly. Of course I use a different app arrangement than on my iPhone. It's all set to find apps quickly using the keyboard shortcuts. Using CMD + Space and Spotlight helps to open apps more quickly as well.
Another thing I love about it is writing text. It's much faster even than on an iPhone using virtual braille input.
Apple recently introduced new shortcuts in conjunction with CMD. For example to open a new element by pressing CMD + n just like on a Mac.
In some cases I'd rather use an iPhone or my Mac. Mail for example is not so nice to use. I don't like the devided screen and CTRL + arrow left or right to jump to useful parts of the app doesn't work so well. I'd love to see Apple more thorrouwly in conceptioning VoiceOver jumping arround on iPads.
Of course I see a lot to improve on iPads with VoiceOver but I learned to love it to some degree. For example I love to write my Diary "Day One" on iPad. The sound quality is much better when listening to meditations in "10% Happier". And Safari really is more fun to use than on an iPhone.
I'm going to buy the new one from 2018 next year even though I like the roundish design of my older iPad Pro better. But the performance seems to be much better and so I'm going to switch.
All the best
I've been an iPad user for several years now,and I can agree with comment 9. I cam to the iPad from Windows, so I didn't have any expectations of MacBook-like performance. That being said, using the iPad as a tablet shows its shortcomings when you have to use apps that rely on touch a great deal, simply because the iPad is what it is, a large tablet. Many games, too, are optimized for use on phones, and playing them on an iPad, especially in portrait mode, is an awkward proposition. To my mind, the iPad really shines when one has to do productivity work like writing documents, or as an entertainment system for listening to music or watching movies. When using the keyboard with iPad Pro, I was able to get much more done than simply using touch.
Could VoiceOver be improved for iPad? Yes, in the way that all things could use improvement But I think third party developers need to take the keyboard more seriously than they have thus far. Apps should be optimized for both keyboard and touch if anyone is seriously going to consider using those apps on an iPad, especially a 12.9-inch Pro model. It is my hope that some day app developers, and especially game developers, begin to code their apps and games with both touch and external keyboards in mind.
Clunky Spellchecking Always Puts me off
I work as a writer and would love to make the jump to the iPad however, the lack of a quick and easy way to correct documents, like in any text editor on the Mac, is a deal breaker for me. It just seems daft to me that apple can't migrate the same shortcut and method of spell checking over. Instead, we have to go through a unnecessarily complicated gestures to fix a word. Until voiceover has the same power and shortcuts with the keyboard on the iPad as with the Mac, it's just not going to be a contender for me as a blind user. The only reason to have the new one is the power as another poster said, excess Realestate is completely pointless if you're blind. Now, if I could match a keyboard with a iPhone and get the same response and utility out of voiceover as I do on my MacBook Pro, then the Mac could go.
I think we need to remember that apple wants to sell us shiny items so none of them should tick all the boxes because, if they did, why would we need to buy anything else.
Hello to all, I have no vision and use my IPad minny with no trouble. I think a person's ability to use an IPad depends on the model of the device. Back in January, I had bought a regular IPad to replace my braillenote, which is sadly on its way out the door, but that's neither here nor there. I found the regular IPad difficult to navigate, mainly because the screen was to big for my small hands. After three days of trying to figure things out, of playing with various apps, and tweeking various settings that I thought would make the IPad easier to use, I boxed it up, and back to the apple store I went to return it. Fast forward a few months, and a slowly dying braille display on my braillenote, and back in the market for something to replace it once and for all. I was visiting my best friend who has an IPad minny. After a few days of playing with her IPad, I thought this was something I could use for most of the things that my braillenote had been used for. When I got my own IPad minny for my birthday, I really started learning how to use it. The screen was much easier to navigate, true, there were some learning curves, but not many. Within two weeks of opening that apple box, my IPad minny had taken over most of the tasks that my braillenote had been used for, and even some things that had been done on my IPhone. Basically, what I'm trying to say here is, sometimes, you have to play around with several devices before you find the one that works best for you.
Tried Out the iPad
I have tried out the iPad before and it's just not for me at least for now. Granted I didn't use VoiceOver when trying out the iPad, but my sighted neighbor across the hall has one. He also has some motor issues and we've talked numerous times about his slow typing. Typing on the iPhone has been a bit of a challenge for me. That said, although I still use the on-screen QWERTY keyboards only I have started randomly tapping on the screen so I am thinking I just might try out one or more of the other iOS typing methods. As far as VoiceOver is concerned, I don't think I'd want to try it out for now at least on an iPad. So I guess what I'm saying is: I'm comfortable with what I have, i.e., mid-2013 MBA and iPhone Seven. VoiceOver has done a stellar job on both for me. As an aside, a downstairs neighbor brought up one of those plastic MacBook cases over the weekend which he had kindly purchased for me. I politely told him thanks but no thanks. I already have the case from my Dell laptop which unfortunately bit the bullet back in about 2012. Hence my switch to the Mac in the first place, but I digress. He totally understood, and kindly took the new case back downstairs. Thank you for this well-rounded post.
has anything changed?
Its been roughly 3 years since this was done. Has anything changed for better or worse?
No recent experience here
I tried fitting an iPad in to my use case again in 2019. This time it was an iPad Air paired with a Bridge keyboard. It lasted a little longer than the iPad Pro mentioned above, but I ended up giving it to my daughter after a few months, as - like my time with the iPad Pro - I found myself nearly always reaching for either my iPhone or MacBook as these typically provided a more satisfying and productive experience.
As always, your own mileage will vary.
iPadOS has continued to evolve and mature in subsequent years, so will likely offer a better user experience now than 3 years ago. Having said that, I've heard an increasing number of mainstream commentators say since the introduction of Apple Silicon on the Mac that their iPads are being used less. This includes previously staunch advocates of the iPad such as FEDERICO VITICCI (“the iPad guy” from MacStories).
For example, see Rediscovering the Mac: An iPad User’s Journey into macOS with the M1 Max MacBook Pro
Despite the above, fitting an iPad in to my use case remains an occasional itch, so I would be keen to hear comments from those on here who have more recent experience and have found a place for one in their own use cases.
For some an iPad can replace a Mac
I'm using currently two Macs, an iPhone Mini, an Apple Watch and two different iPads. I do this for professional reasons. And I mention this because I beleive I have a certain overview when to use which device.
iPad OS has changed during the years but not as quickly as I wished it had. But it has changed. I use it with Quicknav on and off. What changed dramatically is the amount of shortcuts you can use. They are very helpful. So you should really check them out by pressing and holding the Command key in each app.
Apple themselves have increased accessibility in their own apps as well. Pages works much better, Mail, Notes, etc..
You can use external volumes quite easily in the Files app. And if you switch off Quicknav in Files you are able to use Files very similar to the Finder on a Mac just by using up and down arrow to navigate, CMD + up and down to enter folders, CMD + 2 to set it to Listview, etc.. Especially in Files you'll find a huge amount of useful shortcuts.
What I still don't like about iPad OS: in some parts it's cumbersome to use. Look at the Share sheet and you might know what I'm refering to. I wished VoiceOver gave more feedback of what it is doing. For example, if deleting or copying files or folders there'll will be no feedback at all.
And I recommend to have a look at the Commands section in VoiceOver settings to check what shortcuts available for VoiceOver users.
All in all the iPad has improved but for power users it cannot replace the Mac. But for people who want to use the advantages of iOS and only need a little wordprocessing write sometimes a letter and don't need Numbers or Excel the iPad can replace a Mac. Because to learn how to use VoiceOver on a Mac took them much more effort than to work through an iPad.
I definitely recommend to use an external keyboard. I love the iPad Magic Keyboard very much even though it costs a lot of money. But it works the best compaired to all the other keyboards I tried.